SCI

21 April 2024

Validation Study for the N Descriptor of the Newly Proposed 9th Edition of the TNM Staging System Proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

(Journal of Thoracic Oncology, IF: 20.4)

  • In Ha Kim, Geun Dong Lee, Sehoon Choi, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Jae Kwang Yun

  • CORRESPONDENCE TO: drjkyun@gmail.com

Introduction 引言

The aim of this study was to validate the discriminatory ability and clinical utility of the N descriptor of the newly proposed 9th edition of the TNM staging system for lung cancer in a large independent cohort.

本研究的目的是在一个大型独立队列中验证新提出的第九版肺癌TNM分期系统中N描述符的区分能力和临床实用性。

 

Methods 方法

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2004 and December 2019. The N descriptor of patients included in this study was retrospectively reclassified based on the 9th edition of the TNM classification. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model to compare adjacent N categories.

我们回顾性分析了2004年1月至2019年12月期间接受根治性手术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。本研究中包括的患者的N描述符是根据第九版TNM分类回顾性重新分类的。使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析以比较相邻N类别。

 

Results 结果

A total of 6649 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 54 months. According to the newly proposed 9th edition N classification, 5573 (83.8%), 639 (9.6%), 268 (4.0%), and 169 (2.5%) patients were classified into the clinical N0, N1, N2a, and N2b categories and 4957 (74.6%), 744 (11.2%), 567 (8.5%), and 381 (5.7%) were classified into the pathologic N0, N1, N2a, and N2b categories, respectively. The prognostic differences between all adjacent clinical and pathologic N categories were highly significant in terms of both overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS).

本研究共包括6649名患者。中位随访期为54个月。根据新提出的第九版N分类,5573名(83.8%)、639名(9.6%)、268名(4.0%)和169名(2.5%)患者被分类为临床N0、N1、N2a和N2b类别,而4957名(74.6%)、744名(11.2%)、567名(8.5%)和381名(5.7%)患者被分类为病理N0、N1、N2a和N2b类别。所有临床和病理相邻N类别之间的预后差异在总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS)方面均极为显著。

 

Conclusions 结论

We validated the clinical utility of the newly proposed 9th edition N classification for both clinical and pathologic stages in NSCLC. The new N classification showed clear prognostic separation between all categories (N0, N1, N2a, and N2b) in terms of both OS and RFS.

我们验证了新提出的第九版N分类在非小细胞肺癌的临床和病理分期中的临床实用性。新的N分类在总生存和无复发生存方面明确显示了所有类别(N0、N1、N2a和N2b)之间的明确预后分离。

 

 

复制链接或点击原文链接,即可下载SCI原文

W212N05

链接:https://pan.baidu.com/s/194Py6feDciYCsDEGgePPxw?pwd=2op0 

提取码:2op0