SCI
8 August 2024
Benmelstobart, anlotinib and chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial
(Nature Medicine, IF: 58.7)
Ying Cheng , Jianhua Chen, Wei Zhang, Chao Xie, Qun Hu, Ningning Zhou, Chun Huang, Shihong Wei, Hong Sun, Xingya Li, Yan Yu, Jinhuo Lai, Huaping Yang, Haohui Fang, Hualin Chen, Peng Zhang, Kangsheng Gu, Qiming Wang, Jianhua Shi, Tienan Yi, Xingxiang Xu, Xianwei Ye, Daqing Wang, Conghua Xie, Chunling Liu, Yulong Zheng, Daren Lin, Wu Zhuang, Ping Lu, Guohua Yu, Jinzhang Li, Yuhai Gu, Baolan Li, Rong Wu, Ou Jiang, Zaiyi Wang, Guowu Wu, Haifeng Lin, Diansheng Zhong, Yanhua Xu, Yongqian Shu, Di Wu, Xingwu Chen, Jie Wang, Minghui Wang & Runxiang Yang
CORRESPONDENCE TO: jl.cheng@163.com; yrx_research@163.com
Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multitarget anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/ carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC (‘EC alone’; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607.
免疫化疗是广泛性小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线标准治疗方案。将该方案与抗血管生成剂相结合可能会提高疗效。ETER701是一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的3期临床试验,研究了贝莫苏拜单抗(一种新型程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂)与安罗替尼(一种多靶点抗血管生成小分子)和标准化疗在初治ES-SCLC中的疗效和安全性。ETER701试验评估了两个主要终点:独立审查委员会根据RECIST 1.1标准评估的无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)。这里报告了预先指定的最终无进展生存期和中期OS分析。患者随机接受贝莫苏拜单抗和安罗替尼加依托泊苷/卡铂(EC;n=246)、安慰剂和安罗替尼加EC(n=245)或双安慰剂加EC(“单独使用EC”;n=247),然后进行匹配的维持治疗。与单独使用EC相比,贝莫苏拜单抗和安洛替尼加EC延长了中位OS(19.3对11.9个月;风险比0.61;P=0.0002),而安洛替尼加EC的OS改善没有统计学意义(13.3对11.9月;风险比0.86;P=0.1723)。在贝莫苏拜单抗和安洛替尼加EC、安洛替尼加EC和单独EC组中,3级或更高级别治疗相关不良事件的发生率分别为93.1%、94.3%和87.0%。这项免疫化疗加多靶点抗血管生成作为一线治疗的研究,在ES-SCLC患者中实现了比先前随机研究记录的中位OS更好的结果。安全状况被评估为可容忍和可管理的。我们的研究结果表明,在免疫化疗中加入抗血管生成治疗可能是治疗ES-SCLC的有效和安全的方法。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04234607。